Alpha Male-doom
If Alpha males are defined as the leaders, where does that leave the rest of us?
Alphadom in primates and humans is about having the most opportunities at reproduction for yourself, and minimizing those of all other males. There is evidence from the chimpanzee world that Alphas are less aggressive in keeping related males away from the babes than they are with unrelated competitors. That tells us it's all about the genetics, passing along as much of your DNA as possible, as well as the very similar DNA of your brothers and cousins.
In short, Alphas are Alphas because they want, and get, more babies.
In our world matters are more subtle. The reason we aren't like the chimps is because we have complex language. That has, in turn (or coincidentally, depending upon who you read) allowed us to stop being foragers and settle in increasingly abstract communities, starting with multiple family groups, and ending with Calcutta.
Important point: the reason we can live in cities without the Alphas taking us back to the law of the jungle is because language allows males to work together for the good of the society. One way of imagining this is to think of chimps as having a really steep sex-power gradient between the most powerful Alpha and the lowliest male. In human co-operative societies, that gradient is significantly flattened; the lowest male still has a decent shot at reproduction, and won't likely be cock-blocked by the local Alpha.
So in western societies in particular, we're all Alphas now if you define your 'world' closely enough. In a family of man, woman, and immature children, the identity of the Alpha male is obvious. But how useful is it for this regular guy to think and behave like the biologically defined Alpha?
I contend it's time for a new paradigm, a new way for guys to be Alpha-ish without the conflict and aggression of the animal Alpha that lives in our DNA. I think it can be done.












4 comments:
In this new paradigm, Wombat, what will Alpha-ish men be getting if the singular goal is no longer a shot at dominance and reproduction?
Coming at it from another angle, does traditional Alpha-ness get in the way of men having certain things in life they might value?
Some possibilities:
*increased trust and connection between male friends
*better communication with the women in their lives
*feeling less like a solitary solider, and more like a person who belongs - in relationships, in a family, to a community
Kind of like Seth Godin's concept of tribes?
I'd love to see you interview men on this topic.
And yes, I too think it can be done.
What men will gain is a lot of freed-up brain time, a clear understanding of their place in the world, and a way of more productively prioritizing everything in their lives.
Well, that's the ideal, anyway. (Sounds rather grand, don't you think, Doc? They're worthy aims though, if only for finding greater mental calmness.)
I imagine Alpha-ness does mess with other factors in life, but those who will be Alphas will be Alphas, so is there really any change for them?
By definition there will only ever be a small number of real Alphas. What wastes a lot of time is non-Alphas pursuing the unattainable. Hence my re-definition: if you can over-ride the animal desire to be an Alpha (a doomed quest for almost all men) it frees up all that energy for more important, higher-function pursuits, exactly like the ones you list.
In a way, it is subverting evolution, always an absorbing game to play.
What a great idea. It would be great to interview men on this. I should resurrect the radio show and do it.
Any takers for a chat on Alpha-dom?
Youll always be an Alpha marsupial Wombat to me Wombi
Alpha marsupial! That's a nice thing to say, Enigma, thank-you. (Although I think my only serious competition is the kangaroo. Poteroos are pussies.)
Post a Comment